Home/Connecticut Superior Court/Tarnowsky v. Socci, No. Cv00 0177148 S (Dec. 19, 2001)

Tarnowsky v. Socci, No. Cv00 0177148 S (Dec. 19, 2001)

2001 Conn. Super. Ct. 16901
CourtConnecticut Superior Court
DecidedDecember 19, 2001
DocketNo. CV00 0177148 S
StatusUnpublished

This text of 2001 Conn. Super. Ct. 16901 (Tarnowsky v. Socci, No. Cv00 0177148 S (Dec. 19, 2001)) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Connecticut Superior Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Tarnowsky v. Socci, No. Cv00 0177148 S (Dec. 19, 2001), 2001 Conn. Super. Ct. 16901 (Colo. Ct. App. 2001).

Opinion

[EDITOR'S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.]

ORDER
The defendant, Leggatt McCall Property Management of Connecticut, Inc. (Leggatt), filed a motion to reargue the decision rendered by this court on November 20, 2001, denying Leggatt's motion for summary judgment. In denying Leggatt's motion for summary judgment, this court carefully considered the issues and arguments raised by the parties. The cases and arguments presented in Leggatt's motion to reargue fail to persuade this court to revisit these issues. See Opoku v. Grant, 63 Conn. App. 686,692-93, 778 A.2d 981 (2001) ("[al motion to reargue . . . is not to be used as an opportunity . . . to present additional cases or briefs which could have been presented at the time of the original argument."). Accordingly, Leggatt's motion to reargue is denied.

So Ordered.

D'ANDREA, J.T.R. CT Page 16902

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Opoku v. Grant
778 A.2d 981 (Connecticut Appellate Court, 2001)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2001 Conn. Super. Ct. 16901, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/tarnowsky-v-socci-no-cv00-0177148-s-dec-19-2001-connsuperct-2001.