Tarnowsky v. Socci

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Tarnowsky v. Socci

822 A.2d 245, 263 Conn. 921

CourtSupreme Court of Connecticut

DecidedMay 2, 2003

DocketSC 16992

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 822 A.2d 245 (Tarnowsky v. Socci) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Connecticut primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Tarnowsky v. Socci, 822 A.2d 245, 263 Conn. 921 (Colo. 2003).

Pincite

Opinion

The petition by the named defendant, Peter Socci, for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 75 Conn. App. 560 (AC 22905), is granted, limited to the following issue:

[922]*922The Supreme Court docket number is SC 16992. James V. Somers and N. Kane Bennett, in support of the petition. Brenden P. Leydon, in opposition. Decided May 2, 2003

“Did the Appellate Court properly conclude that the plaintiffs action against the named defendant was not barred by General Statutes § 52-584?”

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The petition by the named defendant, Peter Socci, for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 75 Conn. App. 560 (AC 22905), is granted, limited to the following issue:

[922]*922The Supreme Court docket number is SC 16992. James V. Somers and N. Kane Bennett, in support of the petition. Brenden P. Leydon, in opposition. Decided May 2, 2003

“Did the Appellate Court properly conclude that the plaintiffs action against the named defendant was not barred by General Statutes § 52-584?”

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

822 A.2d 245, 263 Conn. 921, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/tarnowsky-v-socci-conn-2003.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack