Tarnowsky v. Socci

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Tarnowsky v. Socci

822 A.2d 245, 263 Conn. 921

Supreme Court of Connecticut·Decided May 2, 2003·No. SC 16992·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

The petition by the named defendant, Peter Socci, for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 75 Conn. App. 560 (AC 22905), is granted, limited to the following issue:

[922] The Supreme Court docket number is SC 16992. James V. Somers and N. Kane Bennett, in support of the petition. Brenden P. Leydon, in opposition. Decided May 2, 2003

“Did the Appellate Court properly conclude that the plaintiffs action against the named defendant was not barred by General Statutes § 52-584?”

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The petition by the named defendant, Peter Socci, for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 75 Conn. App. 560 (AC 22905), is granted, limited to the following issue:

[922] The Supreme Court docket number is SC 16992. James V. Somers and N. Kane Bennett, in support of the petition. Brenden P. Leydon, in opposition. Decided May 2, 2003

“Did the Appellate Court properly conclude that the plaintiffs action against the named defendant was not barred by General Statutes § 52-584?”

Tarnowsky v. Socci, 822 A.2d 245, 263 Conn. 921 (Colo. 2003).

Pincite

822 A.2d 245 (Tarnowsky v. Socci) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related