Tarnef v. Eugenia Hospital
This text of 439 A.2d 1248 (Tarnef v. Eugenia Hospital) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Superior Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
This is an appeal from an order denying a motion for new trial and judgment n.o.v. In light of the fact that the order [375]*375has not been reduced to judgment and docketed,1 we cannot consider the merits of appellant’s contentions. “An order denying a motion for a new trial . . . does not constitute an appealable order.” Pa.R.A.P. 301(c). Therefore, this appeal is premature and must be quashed. Slagter v. Mix, 441 Pa. 272, 272 A.2d 885 (1971); Richard v. Chester Extended Care Center, 287 Pa.Super. 289, 430 A.2d 290 (1981); Brogley v. Chambersburg Engineering Co., 283 Pa.Super. 562, 424 A.2d 952 (1981).
The appeal is quashed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
439 A.2d 1248, 294 Pa. Super. 374, 1982 Pa. Super. LEXIS 3206, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/tarnef-v-eugenia-hospital-pasuperct-1982.