Tarkington v. Mullins

Eighth Circuit

Tarkington v. Mullins

395 F. App'x 307

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit·Decided October 5, 2010·No. No. 10-2022·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Inmate Johnny Tarkington appeals the district court’s¹ adverse grant of summary judgment in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action. [308]*308As to the claims Tarkington has not abandoned on appeal, see Carraher v. Target Corp., 503 F.3d 714, 716 n. 2 (8th Cir.2007), we find that summary judgment was properly granted for the reasons stated by the district court, see Popoalii v. Corr. Med. Servs., 512 F.3d 488, 499 (8th Cir.2008) (de novo standard of review). Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Inmate Johnny Tarkington appeals the district court’s¹ adverse grant of summary judgment in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action. [308]*308As to the claims Tarkington has not abandoned on appeal, see Carraher v. Target Corp., 503 F.3d 714, 716 n. 2 (8th Cir.2007), we find that summary judgment was properly granted for the reasons stated by the district court, see Popoalii v. Corr. Med. Servs., 512 F.3d 488, 499 (8th Cir.2008) (de novo standard of review). Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

Tarkington v. Mullins, 395 F. App'x 307 (8th Cir. 2010).

Pincite

395 F. App'x 307 (Tarkington v. Mullins) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related