Tariq Chowdhury v. Beckford Place Homeowner's Association

Court of Appeals of Texas

Tariq Chowdhury v. Beckford Place Homeowner's Association

DecidedSeptember 27, 2011

Docket14-10-01078-CV

StatusPublished

This text of Tariq Chowdhury v. Beckford Place Homeowner's Association (Tariq Chowdhury v. Beckford Place Homeowner's Association) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Tariq Chowdhury v. Beckford Place Homeowner's Association, (Tex. Ct. App. 2011).

Pincite

Opinion

Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed September 27, 2011.

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals ____________

NO. 14-10-01078-CV ____________

TARIQ CHOWDHURY, Appellant

V.

BECKFORD PLACE HOMEOWNER’S ASSOCIATION, Appellee

On Appeal from the 270th District Court Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 2010-36306

MEMORANDUM OPINION

This is an appeal from a summary judgment signed October 8, 2010. The appeal was abated for a determination as to appellant’s indigence. On March 8, 2011, this court ruled that appellant was deemed indigent for appeal and entitled to preparation of the record without advance payment of costs. See Tex. R. App. P. 20.1.

A complete clerk’s record was filed April 15, 2011, and the appeal was reinstated. The official court reporter advised this court that no reporter’s record was taken in this case. Accordingly, appellant’s brief was due May 14, 2011. See Tex. R. App. P. 38.6(a). Appellant did not file a brief or a motion for extension of time to file his brief. On June 2, 2011, this court issued an order stating that unless appellant filed a brief and a motion reasonably explaining why the brief was late on or before June 20, 2011, the court would dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(b). Appellant requested and was granted an extension of time to file his brief until July 21, 2011. No brief was filed.

On August 11, 2011, this court again issued an order stating that unless appellant filed a brief, together with a motion reasonably explaining why the brief was late, on or before September 12, 2011, the court would dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(b). Appellant has not filed a brief or any other response to the court’s order.

Accordingly, the appeal is ordered dismissed.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Chief Justice Hedges and Justices Anderson and Christopher.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed September 27, 2011.

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals ____________

NO. 14-10-01078-CV ____________

TARIQ CHOWDHURY, Appellant

V.

BECKFORD PLACE HOMEOWNER’S ASSOCIATION, Appellee

On Appeal from the 270th District Court Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 2010-36306

MEMORANDUM OPINION

This is an appeal from a summary judgment signed October 8, 2010. The appeal was abated for a determination as to appellant’s indigence. On March 8, 2011, this court ruled that appellant was deemed indigent for appeal and entitled to preparation of the record without advance payment of costs. See Tex. R. App. P. 20.1.

A complete clerk’s record was filed April 15, 2011, and the appeal was reinstated. The official court reporter advised this court that no reporter’s record was taken in this case. Accordingly, appellant’s brief was due May 14, 2011. See Tex. R. App. P. 38.6(a). Appellant did not file a brief or a motion for extension of time to file his brief. On June 2, 2011, this court issued an order stating that unless appellant filed a brief and a motion reasonably explaining why the brief was late on or before June 20, 2011, the court would dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(b). Appellant requested and was granted an extension of time to file his brief until July 21, 2011. No brief was filed.

On August 11, 2011, this court again issued an order stating that unless appellant filed a brief, together with a motion reasonably explaining why the brief was late, on or before September 12, 2011, the court would dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(b). Appellant has not filed a brief or any other response to the court’s order.

Accordingly, the appeal is ordered dismissed.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Chief Justice Hedges and Justices Anderson and Christopher.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

Tariq Chowdhury v. Beckford Place Homeowner's Association, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/tariq-chowdhury-v-beckford-place-homeowners-associ-texapp-2011.