Targia v. Targia

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Targia v. Targia

29 A.D.2d 664, 287 N.Y.S.2d 870, 1968 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4852

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJanuary 15, 1968

StatusPublished

This text of 29 A.D.2d 664 (Targia v. Targia) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Targia v. Targia, 29 A.D.2d 664, 287 N.Y.S.2d 870, 1968 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4852 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1968).

Pincite

Opinion

Order of the Family Court, Kings County, dated May 25, 1967, which directed appellant to pay $50 a week for support of petitioner, his wife, reversed, on the law and the facts, without costs, and application denied. The separation agreement between the parties bars the relief sought by petitioner unless she demonstrates that she is receiving or is likely to become in need of public assistance or care (Family Ct. Act, § 463). That she failed to do. For the reason that the record is insufficient to make a determination with respect thereto, we do not consider the question of the validity of the Virgin Island divorce obtained by appellant. Brennan, Acting P. J., Rabin, Hopkins, Benjamin and Munder, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order of the Family Court, Kings County, dated May 25, 1967, which directed appellant to pay $50 a week for support of petitioner, his wife, reversed, on the law and the facts, without costs, and application denied. The separation agreement between the parties bars the relief sought by petitioner unless she demonstrates that she is receiving or is likely to become in need of public assistance or care (Family Ct. Act, § 463). That she failed to do. For the reason that the record is insufficient to make a determination with respect thereto, we do not consider the question of the validity of the Virgin Island divorce obtained by appellant. Brennan, Acting P. J., Rabin, Hopkins, Benjamin and Munder, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

29 A.D.2d 664, 287 N.Y.S.2d 870, 1968 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4852, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/targia-v-targia-nyappdiv-1968.