Target Training International, Ltd. v. Extended DISC International, Ltd.
This text of 645 F. App'x 1018 (Target Training International, Ltd. v. Extended DISC International, Ltd.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Appellant Target Training International, Ltd. (“TTI”) appeals from the district court’s dismissal of its suit against Extended DISC International Oy Ltd. (“EDI”) for infringement of U.S. Patent No. 7,249,372 (“the '372 patent”). The court dismissed the suit for lack of personal jurisdiction under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(2). In the companion case, No. 2015-1873, which involves the same patent, we affirmed another district court’s dismissal of that case as moot. At oral argument for this case, counsel conceded that for the purposes of the jurisdictional inquiry, we should look to the original, now canceled claims of the patent. Because the new patent claims added in the reexamination of the patent are not at issue in this case, we find the existing case moot for similar reasons as the companion case. Because the suit is moot, we need not reach the issue of personal jurisdiction. We, therefore, affirm.
AFFIRMED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
645 F. App'x 1018, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/target-training-international-ltd-v-extended-disc-international-ltd-cafc-2016.