Target Graphics Inc. v. Deutsch

282 A.D.2d 601, 723 N.Y.S.2d 380
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided April 16, 2001·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

—In two related actions to recover damages for breach of contract, Ellen Deutsch, a defendant in both Actions, appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Parga, J.), entered April 12, 2000, which denied her motion to consolidate Action No. 1 with Action No. 2.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with one bill of costs to the respondents appearing separately and filing separate briefs.

The Supreme Court providently exercised its discretion in denying the motion to consolidate. Although there are some common issues of law and fact, the actions arise out of different transactions and different claims by the respective plaintiffs (see, CPLR 602 [a]; D'Abreau v American Bankers Ins. Co., 261 AD2d 501; Stephens v Allstate Ins. Co., 185 AD2d 338). O’Brien, J. P., Friedmann, Goldstein and Smith, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Target Graphics Inc. v. Deutsch, 282 A.D.2d 601, 723 N.Y.S.2d 380 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2001).

282 A.D.2d 601 (Target Graphics Inc. v. Deutsch) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Village of Mamaroneck v. Mamaroneck Affordable Condominium Corp.
13 A.D.3d 361 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2004)
G&L Industries, Inc./iOld Action Labs, Inc. v. Bell Bates Co.
293 A.D.2d 511 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2002)