Tardif v. State
589 So. 2d 1040, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 12806, 16 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. D 3046
Opinion
We reverse based on the authorities of Amado v. State, 585 So.2d 282 (Fla.1991) and Essex v. State, 539 So.2d 559 (Fla. 4th DCA 1989).
We find that the remaining points raised by the defendants lack merit.
[1041]*1041Accordingly, we reverse and remand for a new trial.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Tardif v. State, 589 So. 2d 1040, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 12806, 16 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. D 3046 (Fla. Ct. App. 1991).
589 So. 2d 1040 (Tardif v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Essex v. State
539 So. 2d 559 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1989)
Amado v. State
585 So. 2d 282 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1991)