Tardif v. State
589 So. 2d 1040, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 12806, 16 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. D 3046
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedDecember 10, 1991
DocketNos. 90-2210, 90-2714
StatusPublished
This text of 589 So. 2d 1040 (Tardif v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Tardif v. State, 589 So. 2d 1040, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 12806, 16 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. D 3046 (Fla. Ct. App. 1991).
Opinion
We reverse based on the authorities of Amado v. State, 585 So.2d 282 (Fla.1991) and Essex v. State, 539 So.2d 559 (Fla. 4th DCA 1989).
We find that the remaining points raised by the defendants lack merit.
[1041]*1041Accordingly, we reverse and remand for a new trial.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Essex v. State
539 So. 2d 559 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1989)
Amado v. State
585 So. 2d 282 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1991)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
589 So. 2d 1040, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 12806, 16 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. D 3046, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/tardif-v-state-fladistctapp-1991.