Tarburton v. Johnson

166 A. 327, 113 N.J. Eq. 138, 1933 N.J. LEXIS 999
CourtSupreme Court of New Jersey
DecidedApril 28, 1933
StatusPublished

This text of 166 A. 327 (Tarburton v. Johnson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Tarburton v. Johnson, 166 A. 327, 113 N.J. Eq. 138, 1933 N.J. LEXIS 999 (N.J. 1933).

Opinion

Pee Cueiam.

The decree under review will be affirmed, for the reasons set forth in the opinion of Vice-Chancellor Davis as above.

For affirmance — The Chiee-Justice, Trenchard, Parker, Case, Bodine, Donges, Heher, Peeskie, Van Bus-kirk, Kays, Deae, Wells, JJ. 12.

For reversal — None.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
166 A. 327, 113 N.J. Eq. 138, 1933 N.J. LEXIS 999, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/tarburton-v-johnson-nj-1933.