Tarburton v. Hagemann

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Tarburton v. Hagemann

187 A. 749, 117 N.J.L. 294, 1936 N.J. LEXIS 362

DecidedOctober 20, 1936

StatusPublished

This text of 187 A. 749 (Tarburton v. Hagemann) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Tarburton v. Hagemann, 187 A. 749, 117 N.J.L. 294, 1936 N.J. LEXIS 362 (N.J. 1936).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The proofs examined, it clearly appears that a factual question arose as to whether the plaintiff was an invitee at the time of his injuries. This factual question was submitted to the jury by the learned trial judge in a fair and well balanced charge. Timannus v. DeWitt, 109 N. J. L. 168.

The judgment under review is affirmed.

For affirmance — -The Chancellor, Chief Justice, Trenchard, Parker, Lloyd, Case, Bodine, Heher, Perskie, Hetfield, Dear, Wells, WolfsKeil, Rafferty, Cole, JJ. 15.

For reversal — None.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

The proofs examined, it clearly appears that a factual question arose as to whether the plaintiff was an invitee at the time of his injuries. This factual question was submitted to the jury by the learned trial judge in a fair and well balanced charge. Timannus v. DeWitt, 109 N. J. L. 168.

The judgment under review is affirmed.

For affirmance — -The Chancellor, Chief Justice, Trenchard, Parker, Lloyd, Case, Bodine, Heher, Perskie, Hetfield, Dear, Wells, WolfsKeil, Rafferty, Cole, JJ. 15.

For reversal — None.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

187 A. 749, 117 N.J.L. 294, 1936 N.J. LEXIS 362, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/tarburton-v-hagemann-nj-1936.