Tarber v. State

Alabama Court of Appeals

Tarber v. State

114 So. 926, 22 Ala. App. 693

CourtAlabama Court of Appeals

DecidedDecember 20, 1927

Docket6 Div. 191.

StatusPublished

This text of 114 So. 926 (Tarber v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Alabama Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Tarber v. State, 114 So. 926, 22 Ala. App. 693 (Ala. Ct. App. 1927).

Pincite

Opinion

BRICKEN, P. J.

At the November, 1926, term of the Jefferson circuit court, this appellant was convicted of a felony, “buying, receiving, or concealing stolen property knowingly,” etc. The court fixed his punishment at not less than five nor more than six years’ imprisonment in the penitentiary. This appeal was taken from the judgment pronounced and entered. The appeal is upon the record proper. There is no bill of exceptions. This record appears regular in all respects, and, as no error is apparent, the judgment of conviction in the lower court will stand affirmed. Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

BRICKEN, P. J.

At the November, 1926, term of the Jefferson circuit court, this appellant was convicted of a felony, “buying, receiving, or concealing stolen property knowingly,” etc. The court fixed his punishment at not less than five nor more than six years’ imprisonment in the penitentiary. This appeal was taken from the judgment pronounced and entered. The appeal is upon the record proper. There is no bill of exceptions. This record appears regular in all respects, and, as no error is apparent, the judgment of conviction in the lower court will stand affirmed. Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

114 So. 926, 22 Ala. App. 693, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/tarber-v-state-alactapp-1927.