Tarantino Properties, Inc v. Samuel Bonilla
This text of Tarantino Properties, Inc v. Samuel Bonilla (Tarantino Properties, Inc v. Samuel Bonilla) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Opinion issued July 11, 2023
In The
Court of Appeals For The
First District of Texas ———————————— NO. 01-23-00169-CV ——————————— TARANTINO PROPERTIES, INC., Appellant V. SAMUEL BONILLA, Appellee
On Appeal from the 129th District Court Harris County, Texas Trial Court Case No. 2017-71801
MEMORANDUM OPINION
On March 6, 2023, appellant, Tarantino Properties, Inc., filed a notice of
appeal from the trial court’s December 7, 2022 final judgment in favor of appellee,
Samuel Bonilla. On June 27, 2023, the parties, representing that they had “settled the case,” filed a “Joint Motion to Set Aside Trial Court’s Judgment, Release
Supersedeas Bond, and Dismiss Appeal.”
In their motion, the parties stated that they had reached an agreement in which
appellee “agreed to release all claims against” appellant, and therefore “jointly
request[ed] that this Court dismiss this appeal, set aside the trial court’s judgment
without regard to the merits, and remand the case to the trial court with instructions
to release [appellant] and its surety from the Supersedeas Bond filed on December
27, 2022.” See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(a)(2)(A), (B). The parties’ motion further stated
that “[c]osts on appeal should be taxed against the party who incurred the same.”
No other party has filed a notice of appeal, and no opinion has issued. See
TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(a)(2), (c).
Accordingly, we grant the parties’ motion, dismiss the appeal, set aside the
trial court’s judgment without regard to the merits, and remand the case to the trial
court for rendition of judgment in accordance with the parties’ agreement, including
the release of appellant and its surety from the Supersedeas Bond filed on December
27, 2022. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(a)(2)(B), 43.2(e). We direct the Clerk of this
Court that costs are to be taxed against the party incurring the same. See TEX. R.
APP. P. 42.1. We dismiss all other pending motions as moot.
PER CURIAM Panel consists of Chief Justice Adams and Justices Guerra and Farris.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Tarantino Properties, Inc v. Samuel Bonilla, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/tarantino-properties-inc-v-samuel-bonilla-texapp-2023.