Taranov v. Area Agency of Greater Nashua
This text of Taranov v. Area Agency of Greater Nashua (Taranov v. Area Agency of Greater Nashua) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, D. New Hampshire primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE Tatiana Taranov, I v. Case No. 21-cv-995-PB Area Agency of Greater Nashua et al
ORDER No objection having been filed, I herewith approve the Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Andrea K. Johnstone dated December 1, 2021, and dismiss plaintiff’s ADA Title II claims. “‘[O]nly those issues fairly raised by the objections to the magistrate's report are subject to review in the district court and those not preserved by such objection are precluded on appeal.’” School Union No. 37 v. United Nat'l Ins. Co., 617 F.3d 554, 564 (1st Cir. 2010) (quoting Keating v. Secretary of Health & Human Servs., 848 F.2d 271, 275 (1st Cir.1988)); see also United States v. Valencia-Copete, 792 F.2d 4, 6 (1st Cir. 1986) (after proper notice, failure to file a specific objection to magistrate's report will waive the right to appeal). __/_s_/_P_a_u_l_ _B_a_r_b_a_d_o_r_o__________ Paul J. Barbadoro United States District Judge Date: April 5, 2022 cc: Tatiana Taranov, I, pro se Counsel of Record
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Taranov v. Area Agency of Greater Nashua, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/taranov-v-area-agency-of-greater-nashua-nhd-2022.