Tarango (Mayra) Vs. Dist. Ct. (State)

Nevada Supreme Court

Tarango (Mayra) Vs. Dist. Ct. (State)

DecidedMay 20, 2020

Docket81095

StatusPublished

This text of Tarango (Mayra) Vs. Dist. Ct. (State) (Tarango (Mayra) Vs. Dist. Ct. (State)) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Nevada Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Tarango (Mayra) Vs. Dist. Ct. (State), (Neb. 2020).

Pincite

Opinion

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA

MAYRA ARACELI TARANGO, No. 81095 Petitioner, vs. THE EIGHTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT FILE COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA, IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF MAY 2 0 'Llin CLARK, ELI BROYM CLE PREME COURT Respondent, BY and DEPUT: CLERK

THE STATE OF NEVADA, Real Party in Interest.

ORDER DENYING PETITION FOR A WRIT OF MANDAMUS

This original pro se petition for a writ of mandamus seeks a writ directing the district court to vacate her judgement of conviction and allowing her to withdraw her guilty plea and proceed to a jury trial. Problematically, petitioner has not provided this court with all of the exhibits or documentation that would support her claims for relief. See NRAP 21(a)(4) (providing the petitioner shall submit an appendix containing all documents "essential to understand the matters set forth in the petition"). Therefore, without deciding the merits of the claims raised, we decline to exercise our original jurisdiction in this matter. See NRAP 21(b).

SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA

(0) 1947A eatettl. 74- 1923° We reiterate that Ipletitioned j cardies] the burden of demonstrating that extraordinary relief is warranted." Pan v. Eighth Judicial Dist. Court, 120 Nev. 222, 228, 88 P.3d 840, 844 (2004). Accordingly, we deny the petition. It is so ORDERED.

Ade. ,C.J. Pickering

/ A,..e..../.., , J. .#41;114" ,J Hardesty Stiglich

cc: Mayra Araceli Tarango Attorney General/Carson City Clark County District Attorney Eighth District Court Clerk

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA

MAYRA ARACELI TARANGO, No. 81095 Petitioner, vs. THE EIGHTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT FILE COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA, IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF MAY 2 0 'Llin CLARK, ELI BROYM CLE PREME COURT Respondent, BY and DEPUT: CLERK

THE STATE OF NEVADA, Real Party in Interest.

ORDER DENYING PETITION FOR A WRIT OF MANDAMUS

This original pro se petition for a writ of mandamus seeks a writ directing the district court to vacate her judgement of conviction and allowing her to withdraw her guilty plea and proceed to a jury trial. Problematically, petitioner has not provided this court with all of the exhibits or documentation that would support her claims for relief. See NRAP 21(a)(4) (providing the petitioner shall submit an appendix containing all documents "essential to understand the matters set forth in the petition"). Therefore, without deciding the merits of the claims raised, we decline to exercise our original jurisdiction in this matter. See NRAP 21(b).

SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA

(0) 1947A eatettl. 74- 1923° We reiterate that Ipletitioned j cardies] the burden of demonstrating that extraordinary relief is warranted." Pan v. Eighth Judicial Dist. Court, 120 Nev. 222, 228, 88 P.3d 840, 844 (2004). Accordingly, we deny the petition. It is so ORDERED.

Ade. ,C.J. Pickering

/ A,..e..../.., , J. .#41;114" ,J Hardesty Stiglich

cc: Mayra Araceli Tarango Attorney General/Carson City Clark County District Attorney Eighth District Court Clerk

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

Tarango (Mayra) Vs. Dist. Ct. (State), Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/tarango-mayra-vs-dist-ct-state-nev-2020.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack