Tarabochia v. WSI
This text of 2018 ND 39 (Tarabochia v. WSI) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering North Dakota Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Filed 2/22/18 by Clerk of Supreme Court
IN THE SUPREME COURT
STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA
2018 ND 39
Joseph Tarabochia, Appellant
v.
North Dakota Workforce Safety and Insurance, Appellee
No. 20170295
Appeal from the District Court of Williams County, Northwest Judicial District, the Honorable Kirsten M. Sjue, Judge.
AFFIRMED.
Per Curiam.
Joseph Tarabochia, self-represented, Skamokawa, WA, appellant; submitted on brief.
Brian Schmidt (argued) and Mitchell D. Armstrong (on brief), Special Assistant Attorneys General, Bismarck, ND, for appellee.
Tarabochia v. Workforce Safety & Insurance
[¶1] Joseph Tarabochia appealed from a judgment affirming a decision of Workforce Safety and Insurance finding Tarabochia was not entitled to disability benefits for wage loss. Tarabochia argues the Administrative Law Judge (“ALJ”) erred in finding he was not justified in refusing a transitional job offer from his employer. A preponderance of the evidence supports the ALJ’s decision that Tarabochia was not entitled to disability benefits because he voluntarily limited his income without justification. There was no objective medical evidence, even after his traumatic brain injury diagnosis, that Tarabochia was unable to return to work under the restrictions provided by his physician and accommodated by his employer. We summarily affirm the district court judgment under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(5).
[¶2] Gerald W. VandeWalle, C.J.
Jerod E. Tufte
Daniel J. Crothers
Lisa Fair McEvers
Jon J. Jensen
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
2018 ND 39, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/tarabochia-v-wsi-nd-2018.