Taquan Rashad Spriggs v. State
This text of Taquan Rashad Spriggs v. State (Taquan Rashad Spriggs v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In The Court of Appeals Sixth Appellate District of Texas at Texarkana _______________________________
06-20-00053-CR _______________________________
TAQUAN RASHAD SPRIGGS, Appellant
V.
THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee
On Appeal from the 4th District Court Rusk County, Texas Trial Court No. CR19-198
Before Morriss, C.J., Burgess and Stevens, JJ. ORDER
Our review of the reporter’s record in this case indicates that it contains “sensitive data” as
that phrase is defined in Rule 9.10 of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure. See TEX. R. APP.
P. 9.10(a). Sensitive data includes “a driver’s license number, passport number, social security
number, tax identification number or similar government-issued personal identification number.”
TEX. R. APP. P. 9.10(a)(1). Volume five of the reporter’s record includes a social security number.
Rule 9.10(b) states, “Unless a court orders otherwise, an electronic or paper filing with the court,
including the contents of any appendices, must not contain sensitive data.” TEX. R. APP. P. 9.10(b).
Rule 9.10(g) provides, “A court may also order that a document be filed under seal in paper
form or electronic form, without redaction.” TEX. R. APP. P. 9.10(g). Therefore, because volume
five of the reporter’s record contains sensitive data, we order the clerk of this Court or her
appointee, in accordance with Rule 9.10(g), to seal the electronically filed volume five of the
reporter’s record in this case.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
BY THE COURT
Date: August 31, 2020
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Taquan Rashad Spriggs v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/taquan-rashad-spriggs-v-state-texapp-2020.