Tappis v. National Van Lines, Inc.

43 Misc. 2d 157, 250 N.Y.S.2d 466, 1964 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1847
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York·Decided April 22, 1964·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam,

The service of the summons outside the County of Westchester was invalid and conferred no jurisdiction upon the City Court of New Rochelle (New Rochelle City Court Act, § 201; § 205, suhd, 1). Defendant was not in default in raising the jurisdictional question. Service is measured from time of mailing, not time of receipt. (OPDR 2103, suhd. [b], par. 2; Jackson & Perkins Co. v. The Rose Fair, 278 App. Div. 890.)

Furthermore there is no time limit for making an attack based on lack of personal jurisdiction of defendant. (7 Carmody-Wait, New York Practice, p. 390.)

The order should be unanimously reversed, without costs, motion to vacate service of summons granted and cross motion to dismiss special appearance denied.

Concur — Benjamin, Gtjlotta and McDonald, JJ. Order reversed, etc.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Tappis v. National Van Lines, Inc., 43 Misc. 2d 157, 250 N.Y.S.2d 466, 1964 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1847 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1964).

43 Misc. 2d 157 (Tappis v. National Van Lines, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Coyne v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co.
50 Misc. 2d 58 (Syracuse City Court, 1966)