Tapper v. Taunton

371 So. 2d 595, 1979 Fla. App. LEXIS 15135
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedJune 8, 1979
DocketNo. MM-53
StatusPublished
Cited by5 cases

This text of 371 So. 2d 595 (Tapper v. Taunton) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Tapper v. Taunton, 371 So. 2d 595, 1979 Fla. App. LEXIS 15135 (Fla. Ct. App. 1979).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

George Tapper appeals from a final order of dismissal for lack of prosecution. A dismissal for lack of prosecution is not an adjudication on the merits and does not bar subsequent action on the same subject matter, Hassenteufel v. Howard Johnson, Inc., of Florida, 53 So.2d 810 (Fla.1951); thus the words “with prejudice” are surplusage and are hereby stricken from the final order.

The action of the trial court is AFFIRMED in all other respects.

MILLS, Acting C. J., and ROBERT P. SMITH, Jr. and ERVIN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Evans, Evans v. Gulf Landings Association, Inc.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2024
Arraiol v. Dooley
613 So. 2d 944 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1993)
McDaniel v. Onkey
422 So. 2d 70 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1982)
Gries Inv. Co. v. Chelton
388 So. 2d 1281 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1980)
El Mundo Supermarket, Inc. v. Michelsa Supermarket, Inc.
388 So. 2d 324 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1980)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
371 So. 2d 595, 1979 Fla. App. LEXIS 15135, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/tapper-v-taunton-fladistctapp-1979.