Tappe v. Argo Schildknecht Lumber Corp.
14 A.D.2d 889, 220 N.Y.S.2d 993, 1961 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8148
Opinion
The record presents issues of fact as to defendants’ negligence, which should be resolved upon a trial (cf. George Foltis, Inc., v. City of New York, 287 N. Y. 108, 122; Salomone v. Yellow Taxi Corp., 242 N. Y. 251, 259; Nixon v. New York Cent. R. R. Co., 10 A D 2d 870). Nolan, P. J., Ughetta, Christ, Pette and Brennan, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Tappe v. Argo Schildknecht Lumber Corp., 14 A.D.2d 889, 220 N.Y.S.2d 993, 1961 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8148 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1961).
14 A.D.2d 889 (Tappe v. Argo Schildknecht Lumber Corp.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Salomone v. Yellow Taxi Corp.
151 N.E. 442 (New York Court of Appeals, 1926)
George Foltis, Inc. v. City of New York
38 N.E.2d 455 (New York Court of Appeals, 1941)