Home/Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York/Tappe v. Argo Schildknecht Lumber Corp.

Tappe v. Argo Schildknecht Lumber Corp.

14 A.D.2d 889, 220 N.Y.S.2d 993, 1961 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8148
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedNovember 6, 1961
StatusPublished

This text of 14 A.D.2d 889 (Tappe v. Argo Schildknecht Lumber Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Tappe v. Argo Schildknecht Lumber Corp., 14 A.D.2d 889, 220 N.Y.S.2d 993, 1961 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8148 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1961).

Opinion

The record presents issues of fact as to defendants’ negligence, which should be resolved upon a trial (cf. George Foltis, Inc., v. City of New York, 287 N. Y. 108, 122; Salomone v. Yellow Taxi Corp., 242 N. Y. 251, 259; Nixon v. New York Cent. R. R. Co., 10 A D 2d 870). Nolan, P. J., Ughetta, Christ, Pette and Brennan, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Salomone v. Yellow Taxi Corp.
151 N.E. 442 (New York Court of Appeals, 1926)
George Foltis, Inc. v. City of New York
38 N.E.2d 455 (New York Court of Appeals, 1941)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
14 A.D.2d 889, 220 N.Y.S.2d 993, 1961 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8148, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/tappe-v-argo-schildknecht-lumber-corp-nyappdiv-1961.