Tappan v. Gray

New York Supreme Court

Tappan v. Gray

7 Hill & Den. 259

DecidedDecember 15, 1843

StatusPublished

This text of 7 Hill & Den. 259 (Tappan v. Gray) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Tappan v. Gray, 7 Hill & Den. 259 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1843).

Pincite

Opinion

Nelson, Ch. J.

concurred with the chancellor respecting the jurisdiction of courts of equity in cases of this kind, but expressed no opinion as to the legality of the governor’s act in appointing the respondent to perform the duties of flour inspector.

[260]*260Root, senator, also concurred with the chancellor on the question of jurisdiction, but dissented from him as to the legality of the respondent’s appointment.

On the question being put “ Shall this decree be reversed ?” all the members of the court present who heard the argument, eighteen in number, voted for affirming.

Decree affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Nelson, Ch. J.

concurred with the chancellor respecting the jurisdiction of courts of equity in cases of this kind, but expressed no opinion as to the legality of the governor’s act in appointing the respondent to perform the duties of flour inspector.

[260]*260Root, senator, also concurred with the chancellor on the question of jurisdiction, but dissented from him as to the legality of the respondent’s appointment.

On the question being put “ Shall this decree be reversed ?” all the members of the court present who heard the argument, eighteen in number, voted for affirming.

Decree affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

7 Hill & Den. 259, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/tappan-v-gray-nysupct-1843.