Taplin v. Taplin

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Taplin v. Taplin

476 So. 2d 770, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 2349, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 16318

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedOctober 15, 1985

DocketNo. 85-401

StatusPublished

This text of 476 So. 2d 770 (Taplin v. Taplin) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Taplin v. Taplin, 476 So. 2d 770, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 2349, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 16318 (Fla. Ct. App. 1985).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We are convinced that the wife’s application for additional temporary attorney’s fees was denied as a matter of the trial court’s discretion — rather than because of a belief, contrary to Belcher v. Belcher, 271 So.2d 7 (Fla.1972), that none could be awarded under the circumstances as a matter of law. The order is affirmed on the ground that no abuse of that discretion has been demonstrated. Canakaris v. Canakaris, 382 So.2d 1197 (Fla.1980); Muhlrad v. Muhlrad, 375 So.2d 24 (Fla. 3d DCA 1979).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

We are convinced that the wife’s application for additional temporary attorney’s fees was denied as a matter of the trial court’s discretion — rather than because of a belief, contrary to Belcher v. Belcher, 271 So.2d 7 (Fla.1972), that none could be awarded under the circumstances as a matter of law. The order is affirmed on the ground that no abuse of that discretion has been demonstrated. Canakaris v. Canakaris, 382 So.2d 1197 (Fla.1980); Muhlrad v. Muhlrad, 375 So.2d 24 (Fla. 3d DCA 1979).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

476 So. 2d 770, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 2349, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 16318, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/taplin-v-taplin-fladistctapp-1985.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack