Taplin v. Taplin
361 So. 2d 827, 1978 Fla. App. LEXIS 16555
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Taplin v. Taplin. Read the opinion of the Court — 341 So. 2d 1064 →
Opinion
The appellant wife appeals an order denying her petition for modification and her petition for attorney’s fees. She urges error upon the argument that the manifest weight of the evidence established her need for, and the husband’s ability to respond to, an increase in alimony. We find that no error has been shown. See Herzog v. Herzog, 346 So.2d 56 (Fla.1977); and Shaw v. Shaw, 334 So.2d 13 (Fla.1976).
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Taplin v. Taplin, 361 So. 2d 827, 1978 Fla. App. LEXIS 16555 (Fla. Ct. App. 1978).
361 So. 2d 827 (Taplin v. Taplin) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Shaw v. Shaw
334 So. 2d 13 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1976)
Herzog v. Herzog
346 So. 2d 56 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1977)