Tapliff v. Davis

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Tapliff v. Davis

1 Root 556

DecidedMarch 15, 1793

StatusPublished

This text of 1 Root 556 (Tapliff v. Davis) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Connecticut primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Tapliff v. Davis, 1 Root 556 (Colo. 1793).

Pincite

Opinion

The statute is positive, that the execution; and officer’s return, must be recorded in the office of the clerk of the court from whence it issued, in order to complete the title; but this was not done by the defendant until mouths after the plain-tff’s title was perfected. There appears to be no fraud practiced by the plaintiff, he was vigilant in securing his debt; but there appears to be great inattention and gross negligence on the part of the defendant.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The statute is positive, that the execution; and officer’s return, must be recorded in the office of the clerk of the court from whence it issued, in order to complete the title; but this was not done by the defendant until mouths after the plain-tff’s title was perfected. There appears to be no fraud practiced by the plaintiff, he was vigilant in securing his debt; but there appears to be great inattention and gross negligence on the part of the defendant.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1 Root 556, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/tapliff-v-davis-conn-1793.