Tapley v. New York Dock Railway

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Tapley v. New York Dock Railway

206 A.D. 678

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Tapley v. New York Dock Railway. Read the opinion of the Court — 199 A.D. 664 →

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided April 15, 1923·Published

Opinion

Motion to confirm report of referee granted. The question of allowances to the referee and counsel will be determined upon the settlement of the order, at which time affidavits should be submitted as to the nature and extent of the services rendered and the time occupied by the referee. While the court has full jurisdiction of the subject-matter submitted to the referee, we are without power to direct a judgment for deficiency under the circumstances disclosed by the record here. For such relief the successful party may take such action as he may be advised. Present — Kelly, P. J., Manning, Kelby, Young and Kapper, JJ. Settle order on notice.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Motion to confirm report of referee granted. The question of allowances to the referee and counsel will be determined upon the settlement of the order, at which time affidavits should be submitted as to the nature and extent of the services rendered and the time occupied by the referee. While the court has full jurisdiction of the subject-matter submitted to the referee, we are without power to direct a judgment for deficiency under the circumstances disclosed by the record here. For such relief the successful party may take such action as he may be advised. Present — Kelly, P. J., Manning, Kelby, Young and Kapper, JJ. Settle order on notice.

Tapley v. New York Dock Railway, 206 A.D. 678 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1923).

Pincite

206 A.D. 678 (Tapley v. New York Dock Railway) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.