Tapinekis v. Pace University

District Court, S.D. New York·Decided August 4, 2021·No. 1:20-cv-03210·Unknown

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK XAVIERA MARBURY, Civil Action No. 1:20-cv-3210 Plaintiff, CONFIDENTIALITY v. STIPULATION AND PROTECTIVE ORDER PACE UNIVERSITY, Defendant. The parties have agreed to the terms of this Confidentiality Stipulation and Protective Order; accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED: SCOPE OF THIS ORDER 1. This Protective Order shall apply to all information and documents produced by any party pursuant to interrogatories, depositions, requests for production of documents, requests for admissions, or other formal or informal discovery requests and all information provided by any party in connection with any evidentiary hearing or other proceeding conducted prior to trial in this action. IDENTIFICATION OF STUDENTS 2. Throughout the course of discovery in this action, Defendant may provide student records as part of discovery. In the event documents or information are produced that include identifying information of Defendant students, such identifying information of students other than the Named Plaintiff(s) shall be marked “CONFIDENTIAL” pursuant to paragraph 3 below and may be redacted or identified by anonymous identifiers. In the event the identify of a student other than the Named Plaintiff is inadvertently disclosed, Plaintiff agrees to maintain the Confidentiality of that identity pursuant to this Protective Order. In the event any party requests that the identity of a student that has either been redacted or anonymized be disclosed, the Parties will work in good faith to resolve such a request. CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION 3. Any party to this case may designate as “CONFIDENTIAL” documents

(including electronically stored information), responses to requests for information or documents, deposition transcripts, hearing testimony, and any other documents, material and information produced or disclosed by any party in this matter. The parties shall have the right to designate as “CONFIDENTIAL” and subject to this Stipulation any information, documents, or ting, or portion of any document or thing: (a) that contains trade secrets or other confidential research, development or proprietary information; (b) that contains confidential personal or medical information; (c) that contains educational records of Defendant’s students; (d) that contains information received in confidence from third parties; or (e) which the producing party believes in good faith to be entitled to protection under Rule 26(c) of the Federal Rules of Civil

Procedure and/or the Local Rules of the United States District Courts for the Southern and Eastern Districts of New York. DESIGNATING MATERIALS CONFIDENTIAL 4. A party may designate materials as “CONFIDENTIAL” in the following manner: a. Documents. At the time of production, a party should designate or stamp the word “CONFIDENTIAL” on any particular document. Where a document is produced in electronic form, the drive, disc or electronic media storage device shall be marked “CONFIDENTIAL.” In addition, the information or documents contained in the electronic record should be designated as “CONFIDENTIAL” such that to the extent any party prints or reproduces any information or any documents produced in electronic format, any such printouts or reproduction shall automatically include the designation of “CONFIDENTIAL.” If a party believes that a particular document or documents contained within another party’s document production should be treated as CONFIDENTIAL, that party shall so notify all parties within thirty (30) days of receipt of said production. If the parties cannot agree on the

CONFIDENTIAL nature of the document or documents in question, then the party seeking CONFIDENTIAL treatment may apply to the court for a protective order. Until such time as the court decides any such application all parties shall treat the disputed document or documents as CONFIDENTIAL. A party does not waive its right to move to designate material “CONFIDENTIAL” after the passage of 30 days after receipt of any production if good cause can be shown for the delay. b. Interrogatories or Request for Admissions. A party may designate an interrogatory or answer as “CONFIDENTIAL” by identifying it as such. Such “CONFIDENTIAL” interrogatories or responses should be made on separate pages from any

other interrogatories or answers or portions of interrogatories or answers that are not designated as “CONFIDENTIAL.” c. Testimony. Any party giving pretrial testimony by deposition or affidavit in this action may obtain “CONFIDENTIAL” treatment for all or part of the deposition or affidavit testimony. Each paragraph of an affidavit containing “CONFIDENTIAL” information shall be designated as such and shall appear on a separate page from paragraphs which do not contain “CONFIDENTIAL” information. Deposition testimony may be designated during the course of that testimony by designating the precise testimony claimed to be “CONFIDENTIAL.” The reporter shall separately transcribe and bind deposition testimony so designated as “CONFIDENTIAL” and shall mark the face of the separate bound transcript containing “CONFIDENTIAL” testimony with the term “CONFIDENTIAL.” Such deposition testimony may also be designated as “CONFIDENTIAL” by giving written notice to the opposing party within thirty (30) days after receipt of the transcript of such testimony, setting forth the pages and lines of such transcript which are “CONFIDENTIAL.”

5. “CONFIDENTIAL” materials should not be disclosed to persons other than the attorneys for the parties, the Named Plaintiff, representatives or employees of Defendant, or independent third parties retained or used by the attorneys of record in this litigation as is reasonably necessary for purposes of preparation, trial, appeal or settlement of this litigation. “CONFIDENTIAL” documents or testimony, copies thereof, and the information contained therein, shall not be disclosed in any manner to any other individual, until and unless (a) outside counsel for the party or the party asserting confidentiality waives the claim of confidentiality, or (b)the Court orders such disclosure. 6. Each person (other than the Named Plaintiff and representatives of Defendant) to

whom information or a document designated as “CONFIDENTIAL” is disclosed shall be informed of the terms of this order and must agree to be bound by it by executing Exhibit A before disclosure to such person of any such information or document. FILING AND USE IN COURT OF DESIGNATED MATERIALS 7. In the event that any party files “CONFIDENTIAL” materials with the Court supporting a motion or other court filing, the party shall file such documents under seal using the Court-authorized procedure for filing documents under seal as set forth by the Court’s procedure. 8. This Order does not limit or waive the right of any party to object to the scope of discovery in this litigation or to the admissibility at trial of any proffered evidence, documentary or otherwise. 9. This Protective Order does not constitute a finding or evidence that any of the information disclosed or contained in the produced or designated materials is or is not

“CONFIDENTIAL” or proprietary in nature. 10. Nothing contained in this Protective Order shall restrict or prevent any party to this action from disclosing or otherwise using its own documents and information. The failure of a party producing information or documents to designate such materials “CONFIDENTIAL” shall not preclude such party from later applying to the court for the entry of a protective order. 11. Nothing contained in this Protective Order shall be construed to, prohibit any party from disclosing information and/or documents or things that are in the public domain. Likewise, the designation by a party of something as “CONFIDENTIAL” does not and shall not make any such information, document and/or thing a trade secret and/or “CONFIDENTIAL”

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Tapinekis v. Pace University, (S.D.N.Y. 2021).

Tapinekis v. Pace University (Tapinekis v. Pace University) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Lugosch v. Pyramid Co. of Onondaga
435 F.3d 110 (Second Circuit, 2006)