Tapia, Jose Ambrosio

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas
DecidedJanuary 29, 2026
DocketWR-96,741-01
StatusPublished

This text of Tapia, Jose Ambrosio (Tapia, Jose Ambrosio) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Tapia, Jose Ambrosio, (Tex. 2026).

Opinions

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS NO. WR-96,741-01

EX PARTE JOSE AMBROSIO TAPIA, Applicant

ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS CAUSE NO. 1053651-A IN THE 339TH DISTRICT COURT HARRIS COUNTY

Per curiam. SCHENCK, P,J. filed a concurring opinion. PARKER, J., filed a dissenting opinion joined by YEARY and FINLEY, J.J.

OPINION

Applicant was convicted of aggravated robbery and sentenced to life

imprisonment. The First Court of Appeals affirmed his conviction. Tapia v. State,

No. 01-06-00915-CR (Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist] Jan. 15, 2008)(not designated

for publication). Applicant filed this application for a writ of habeas corpus in the

county of conviction, and the district clerk forwarded it to this Court. See TEX. CODE 2

CRIM. PROC. art. 11.07.

Applicant contends that appellate counsel failed to timely inform Applicant that

his conviction had been affirmed. Based on the record, the trial court has determined

that appellate counsel’s performance was deficient and he is entitled to relief.

Relief is granted. Ex parte Wilson, 956 S.W.2d 25 (Tex. Crim. App. 1997); Ex

parte Crow, 180 S.W.3d 135 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005). Applicant may file an out-of-

time petition for discretionary review of the judgment of the First Court of Appeals

in cause number 01-06-00915-CR. Should Applicant decide to file a petition for

discretionary review, he must file it with this Court within thirty days from the date

of this Court’s mandate.

Copies of this opinion shall be sent to the Texas Department of Criminal

Justice–Correctional Institutions Division and the Board of Pardons and Paroles.

Delivered: January 29, 2026 Do not publish

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Griffin v. Illinois
351 U.S. 12 (Supreme Court, 1956)
Florida v. Rodriguez
469 U.S. 1 (Supreme Court, 1984)
Honda Motor Co. v. Oberg
512 U.S. 415 (Supreme Court, 1994)
Ex Parte Crow
180 S.W.3d 135 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 2005)
Ex Parte Wilson
956 S.W.2d 25 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1997)
Ex Parte Galvan
770 S.W.2d 822 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1989)
Ex Parte Carrio
992 S.W.2d 486 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1999)
Ex Parte Cristela GARCIA, Appellee
353 S.W.3d 785 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 2011)
State of Texas v. Guerrero, Ex Parte Marcelino
400 S.W.3d 576 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 2013)
Perez, Ex Parte Alberto Giron
398 S.W.3d 206 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 2013)
Gilley, Brian Shawn
418 S.W.3d 114 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 2014)
Ex parte Ambrose
170 S.W.2d 731 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1943)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Tapia, Jose Ambrosio, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/tapia-jose-ambrosio-texcrimapp-2026.