Tap Electrical Contracting Service, Inc. v. Hartnett
567 N.E.2d 979, 77 N.Y.2d 833, 566 N.Y.S.2d 585, 1991 N.Y. LEXIS 94
This text of 567 N.E.2d 979 (Tap Electrical Contracting Service, Inc. v. Hartnett) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Tap Electrical Contracting Service, Inc. v. Hartnett, 567 N.E.2d 979, 77 N.Y.2d 833, 566 N.Y.S.2d 585, 1991 N.Y. LEXIS 94 (N.Y. 1991).
Opinion
Motion for extension of the time within which to move for reargument denied with $100 costs and necessary reproduction disbursements. Motion for reargument dismissed as untimely.
Judge Kaye taking no part. [See, 76 NY2d 164.]
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Tap Electrical Contracting Service, Inc. v. Hartnett
556 N.E.2d 427 (New York Court of Appeals, 1990)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
567 N.E.2d 979, 77 N.Y.2d 833, 566 N.Y.S.2d 585, 1991 N.Y. LEXIS 94, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/tap-electrical-contracting-service-inc-v-hartnett-ny-1991.