Tap Electrical Contracting Service, Inc. v. Hartnett
567 N.E.2d 979, 77 N.Y.2d 833, 566 N.Y.S.2d 585, 1991 N.Y. LEXIS 94
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Tap Electrical Contracting Service, Inc. v. Hartnett. Read the opinion of the Court — 76 N.Y.2d 164 →
Opinion
Motion for extension of the time within which to move for reargument denied with $100 costs and necessary reproduction disbursements. Motion for reargument dismissed as untimely.
Judge Kaye taking no part. [See, 76 NY2d 164.]
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Tap Electrical Contracting Service, Inc. v. Hartnett, 567 N.E.2d 979, 77 N.Y.2d 833, 566 N.Y.S.2d 585, 1991 N.Y. LEXIS 94 (N.Y. 1991).
567 N.E.2d 979 (Tap Electrical Contracting Service, Inc. v. Hartnett) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Tap Electrical Contracting Service, Inc. v. Hartnett
556 N.E.2d 427 (New York Court of Appeals, 1990)