Taos Construction, Inc. v. Mandico

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Taos Construction, Inc. v. Mandico

566 So. 2d 910, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 6905, 1990 WL 130233

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedSeptember 12, 1990

DocketNo. 89-2612

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 566 So. 2d 910 (Taos Construction, Inc. v. Mandico) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Taos Construction, Inc. v. Mandico, 566 So. 2d 910, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 6905, 1990 WL 130233 (Fla. Ct. App. 1990).

Pincite

Opinions

ON MOTION FOR REHEARING AND CERTIFICATION

PER CURIAM.

We grant respondent’s motion for rehearing, withdraw our opinion filed May 16, 1990 and substitute for it the following:

Petitioners, Taos Construction, Inc., and its employee, Willie Philmore, seek review by petition for writ of certiorari of an order of the trial court denying their motion for summary judgment. Said motion, among other things, contended that the record before the court clearly demonstrated the absence of a genuine issue of material fact regarding petitioners’ defense of immunity under the Florida Workers’ Compensation statute because a workers’ compensation insurance policy was procured by Taos Construction, Inc., and respondent claimed [911]*911and received workers’ compensation under that policy for the injuries alleged in said cause.

Since on this record it is clear that petitioners are immune from suit for these injuries, the circuit court is without jurisdiction to proceed further against these petitioners. Accordingly, the petition for writ of certiorari is treated as a petition for writ of prohibition, said writ is granted, and the order denying summary judgment is quashed. However, we do certify the following as being of great public importance:

MAY A GENERAL CONTRACTOR, WHO PROVIDES WORKER’S COMPENSATION COVERAGE FOR AN INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR BY DEDUCTING THE COVERAGE PREMIUMS FROM PAYMENTS DUE THAT INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR, CLAIM IMMUNITY FROM THE INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR’S CIVIL SUIT FOR PERSONAL INJURY UNDER THE WORKER’S COMPENSATION STATUTE WHERE THE INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR CLAIMED AND RECOVERED WORKER’S COMPENSATION BENEFITS?

MAY TRIAL COURT ORDERS, DENYING IMMUNITY FROM CIVIL SUIT UNDER THE WORKER’S COMPENSATION STATUTE, BE REVIEWED BY A WRIT OF PROHIBITION?

DOWNEY and GLICKSTEIN, JJ., concur. DELL, J., dissents with opinion.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ON MOTION FOR REHEARING AND CERTIFICATION

PER CURIAM.

We grant respondent’s motion for rehearing, withdraw our opinion filed May 16, 1990 and substitute for it the following:

Petitioners, Taos Construction, Inc., and its employee, Willie Philmore, seek review by petition for writ of certiorari of an order of the trial court denying their motion for summary judgment. Said motion, among other things, contended that the record before the court clearly demonstrated the absence of a genuine issue of material fact regarding petitioners’ defense of immunity under the Florida Workers’ Compensation statute because a workers’ compensation insurance policy was procured by Taos Construction, Inc., and respondent claimed [911]*911and received workers’ compensation under that policy for the injuries alleged in said cause.

Since on this record it is clear that petitioners are immune from suit for these injuries, the circuit court is without jurisdiction to proceed further against these petitioners. Accordingly, the petition for writ of certiorari is treated as a petition for writ of prohibition, said writ is granted, and the order denying summary judgment is quashed. However, we do certify the following as being of great public importance:

MAY A GENERAL CONTRACTOR, WHO PROVIDES WORKER’S COMPENSATION COVERAGE FOR AN INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR BY DEDUCTING THE COVERAGE PREMIUMS FROM PAYMENTS DUE THAT INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR, CLAIM IMMUNITY FROM THE INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR’S CIVIL SUIT FOR PERSONAL INJURY UNDER THE WORKER’S COMPENSATION STATUTE WHERE THE INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR CLAIMED AND RECOVERED WORKER’S COMPENSATION BENEFITS?

MAY TRIAL COURT ORDERS, DENYING IMMUNITY FROM CIVIL SUIT UNDER THE WORKER’S COMPENSATION STATUTE, BE REVIEWED BY A WRIT OF PROHIBITION?

DOWNEY and GLICKSTEIN, JJ., concur. DELL, J., dissents with opinion.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

566 So. 2d 910, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 6905, 1990 WL 130233, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/taos-construction-inc-v-mandico-fladistctapp-1990.

Opinions

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack