Taormina v. Thos. Roulston, Inc.
This text of 243 A.D. 619 (Taormina v. Thos. Roulston, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Order grantmg defendant’s motion to vacate notice of examination before trial served by the plaintiff in an action for injuries received as a consequence of the collision of an automoMle and a truck reversed on the law and the facts, with ten doEars costs and disbursements, and the motion demed, with ten doEars costs; examination to proceed on Eve days’ notice. The plaintiff was entitled to the examination sought under settled authority in tMs Department. (Shweky v. Goldberg, 240 App. Div. 999.) Lazansky, P. J., Young, CarsweE, Davis and Johnston, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
243 A.D. 619, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/taormina-v-thos-roulston-inc-nyappdiv-1935.