Taormina v. Poline

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Taormina v. Poline

192 A. 73, 122 N.J. Eq. 221, 1937 N.J. LEXIS 583

Supreme Court of New Jersey·Decided April 30, 1937·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.

We have carefully examined the pleadings and proofs, together with the conclusions of the learned vice-chancellor who heard the cause. We can only conclude that the decree appealed from was proper, and it is, therefore, affirmed, with costs.

For affirmance — The Chief-Justice, Trenchard, Parker, Lloyd, Case, Bodine, Donges, Heher, Perskie, Heteield, Dear, Wells, WolesKeil, Raeeerty, Cole, JJ. 15.

For reversal — None.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

We have carefully examined the pleadings and proofs, together with the conclusions of the learned vice-chancellor who heard the cause. We can only conclude that the decree appealed from was proper, and it is, therefore, affirmed, with costs.

For affirmance — The Chief-Justice, Trenchard, Parker, Lloyd, Case, Bodine, Donges, Heher, Perskie, Heteield, Dear, Wells, WolesKeil, Raeeerty, Cole, JJ. 15.

For reversal — None.

Taormina v. Poline, 192 A. 73, 122 N.J. Eq. 221, 1937 N.J. LEXIS 583 (N.J. 1937).

Pincite

192 A. 73 (Taormina v. Poline) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.