Taormina v. Poline

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Taormina v. Poline

192 A. 73, 122 N.J. Eq. 221, 1937 N.J. LEXIS 583

DecidedApril 30, 1937

StatusPublished

This text of 192 A. 73 (Taormina v. Poline) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Taormina v. Poline, 192 A. 73, 122 N.J. Eq. 221, 1937 N.J. LEXIS 583 (N.J. 1937).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

We have carefully examined the pleadings and proofs, together with the conclusions of the learned vice-chancellor who heard the cause. We can only conclude that the decree appealed from was proper, and it is, therefore, affirmed, with costs.

For affirmance — The Chief-Justice, Trenchard, Parker, Lloyd, Case, Bodine, Donges, Heher, Perskie, Heteield, Dear, Wells, WolesKeil, Raeeerty, Cole, JJ. 15.

For reversal — None.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

We have carefully examined the pleadings and proofs, together with the conclusions of the learned vice-chancellor who heard the cause. We can only conclude that the decree appealed from was proper, and it is, therefore, affirmed, with costs.

For affirmance — The Chief-Justice, Trenchard, Parker, Lloyd, Case, Bodine, Donges, Heher, Perskie, Heteield, Dear, Wells, WolesKeil, Raeeerty, Cole, JJ. 15.

For reversal — None.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

192 A. 73, 122 N.J. Eq. 221, 1937 N.J. LEXIS 583, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/taormina-v-poline-nj-1937.