Tanzman v. Meurer
23 A.3d 724, 301 Conn. 930, 2011 Conn. LEXIS 310
This text of 23 A.3d 724 (Tanzman v. Meurer) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Connecticut primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Tanzman v. Meurer, 23 A.3d 724, 301 Conn. 930, 2011 Conn. LEXIS 310 (Colo. 2011).
Opinion
The plaintiffs petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 128 Conn. App. 405 (AC 30723/AC 30973), is granted, limited to the following issue:
“Did the Appellate Court properly determine that, in a family case, the trial court is not required to specify the earning capacity amount it relied on in determining alimony and child support, after motions for articulation and/or clarification are filed requesting said information?”
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
TANZMAN v. Meurer
16 A.3d 1265 (Connecticut Appellate Court, 2011)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
23 A.3d 724, 301 Conn. 930, 2011 Conn. LEXIS 310, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/tanzman-v-meurer-conn-2011.