Tanzi v. Nahigian

Ohio Supreme Court

Tanzi v. Nahigian

705 N.E.2d 690, 84 Ohio St. 3d 1494, 1999 Ohio LEXIS 892

CourtOhio Supreme Court

DecidedFebruary 10, 1999

Docket98-207

StatusPublished

This text of 705 N.E.2d 690 (Tanzi v. Nahigian) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Tanzi v. Nahigian, 705 N.E.2d 690, 84 Ohio St. 3d 1494, 1999 Ohio LEXIS 892 (Ohio 1999).

Pincite

Opinion

Cuyahoga App. No. 71872. This cause is pending before the court as a discretionary appeal. On March 2, 1998, this court granted appellant’s motion for stay on the ground that Judge Michael Watson of the Franklin County Court of Common Pleas stayed all actions pending against insureds of PIE Mutual Insurance Company. On June 11, 1998, appellant filed a notice that Judge Watson had ordered that the stay remain in effect until September 23, 1998. It appearing to the court that the stay granted by Judge Watson has expired,

IT IS ORDERED by the court, sua sponte, that the stay granted by this court be, and hereby is, lifted.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED by the court, sua sponte, that appellees may file a memorandum in response within thirty days of the date of this entry.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cuyahoga App. No. 71872. This cause is pending before the court as a discretionary appeal. On March 2, 1998, this court granted appellant’s motion for stay on the ground that Judge Michael Watson of the Franklin County Court of Common Pleas stayed all actions pending against insureds of PIE Mutual Insurance Company. On June 11, 1998, appellant filed a notice that Judge Watson had ordered that the stay remain in effect until September 23, 1998. It appearing to the court that the stay granted by Judge Watson has expired,

IT IS ORDERED by the court, sua sponte, that the stay granted by this court be, and hereby is, lifted.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED by the court, sua sponte, that appellees may file a memorandum in response within thirty days of the date of this entry.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

705 N.E.2d 690, 84 Ohio St. 3d 1494, 1999 Ohio LEXIS 892, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/tanzi-v-nahigian-ohio-1999.