Tanya Spicer v. The Ryland Group, Inc.
This text of 294 F. App'x 434 (Tanya Spicer v. The Ryland Group, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Appellant, Tanya Spicer, on behalf of herself and a putative nationwide class of individuals, appeals the district court’s order, granting a motion to dismiss in favor of Appellees, Ryland Group, Inc., that was based on the district court’s determination that defendants’ offering a discount on settlement services, conditioned upon the use of an affiliated business arrangement in this case was not a violation of the Real Estate Settlement Procedures Act, 12 U.S.C. §§ 2607(a) and (b). See Spicer v. Ryland Group. Inc., 523 F.Supp.2d 1356 (N.D.Ga.2007). We have considered the briefs, the relevant parts of the record, and the well-reasoned opinion by the district court and conclude that the district court did not err, and properly granted Defendant-Appellees’ motion to dismiss against Plaintiff-Appellant.
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
294 F. App'x 434, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/tanya-spicer-v-the-ryland-group-inc-ca11-2008.