Tanya Boyd Harper v. Brookshire Grocery

Eighth Circuit

Tanya Boyd Harper v. Brookshire Grocery

200 F. App'x 618

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

DecidedNovember 14, 2006

Docket05-3812

StatusUnpublished

This text of 200 F. App'x 618 (Tanya Boyd Harper v. Brookshire Grocery) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Tanya Boyd Harper v. Brookshire Grocery, 200 F. App'x 618 (8th Cir. 2006).

Pincite

Opinion

[UNPUBLISHED]

PER CURIAM.

Tanya Boyd Harper appeals from the district court’s 1 adverse grant of summary judgment. In this diversity action, Harper claimed that Brookshire Grocery Company wrongfully discharged her, defamed her, and committed the tort of outrage against her.

Upon de novo review, see Dennen v. City of Duluth, 350 F.3d 786, 790 (8th Cir.2003), we find the district court’s analysis to be correct, thorough, and well-reasoned. Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

1

. The Honorable Harry F. Barnes, United States District Judge for the Western District of Arkansas.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI