Tanya Boyd Harper v. Brookshire Grocery

Eighth Circuit

Tanya Boyd Harper v. Brookshire Grocery

200 F. App'x 618

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit·Decided November 14, 2006·No. 05-3812·Unpublished

Opinion

[UNPUBLISHED]

PER CURIAM.

Tanya Boyd Harper appeals from the district court’s 1 adverse grant of summary judgment. In this diversity action, Harper claimed that Brookshire Grocery Company wrongfully discharged her, defamed her, and committed the tort of outrage against her.

Upon de novo review, see Dennen v. City of Duluth, 350 F.3d 786, 790 (8th Cir.2003), we find the district court’s analysis to be correct, thorough, and well-reasoned. Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

1

. The Honorable Harry F. Barnes, United States District Judge for the Western District of Arkansas.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

[UNPUBLISHED]

PER CURIAM.

Tanya Boyd Harper appeals from the district court’s 1 adverse grant of summary judgment. In this diversity action, Harper claimed that Brookshire Grocery Company wrongfully discharged her, defamed her, and committed the tort of outrage against her.

Upon de novo review, see Dennen v. City of Duluth, 350 F.3d 786, 790 (8th Cir.2003), we find the district court’s analysis to be correct, thorough, and well-reasoned. Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

1

. The Honorable Harry F. Barnes, United States District Judge for the Western District of Arkansas.

Tanya Boyd Harper v. Brookshire Grocery, 200 F. App'x 618 (8th Cir. 2006).

Pincite

200 F. App'x 618 (Tanya Boyd Harper v. Brookshire Grocery) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related