Tanxley v. Lampkin
39 S.E. 473, 113 Ga. 1007, 1901 Ga. LEXIS 451
Opinion
Where a laborer institutes a suit to foreclose a lien which he claims against real estate, and on the trial of the issue formed thereon there is no testimony to show that he has completed his contract of labor, a verdict for the defendant is demanded by the evidence. In the present case, therefore, the court did not err in overruling the certiorari. ■
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Tanxley v. Lampkin, 39 S.E. 473, 113 Ga. 1007, 1901 Ga. LEXIS 451 (Ga. 1901).
39 S.E. 473 (Tanxley v. Lampkin) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Harvey v. Lewis
91 S.E. 1052 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1917)
Haralson v. Speer
58 S.E. 142 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1907)
Faircloth v. Webb
53 S.E. 592 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1906)