Tantimonico v. Allendale Mutual Insurance
Opinion
ORDER
This matter came before the court on the petitions of plaintiffs Guy Tantimonico and John McPhillips, Jr. for reargument. Pursuant to these petitions, we take this opportunity to reemphasize that this court was of the opinion that defendant owed no legal duty to the plaintiffs under either the holding in Mariorenzi v. DiPonte, Inc., 114 R.I. 294, 333 A.2d 127 (1975) or under the common law rule regarding the landowner’s obligation to trespassers. There is in this case no evidence of any wanton or willful conduct on the part of the defendant.
Accordingly, the petitions for reargument are denied.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
642 A.2d 1169 (Tantimonico v. Allendale Mutual Insurance) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.