Tantimonico v. Allendale Mutual Insurance

642 A.2d 1169, 1994 R.I. LEXIS 146, 1994 WL 171753
Supreme Court of Rhode Island·Decided April 22, 1994·No. No. 92-484-A·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

ORDER

This matter came before the court on the petitions of plaintiffs Guy Tantimonico and John McPhillips, Jr. for reargument. Pursuant to these petitions, we take this opportunity to reemphasize that this court was of the opinion that defendant owed no legal duty to the plaintiffs under either the holding in Mariorenzi v. DiPonte, Inc., 114 R.I. 294, 333 A.2d 127 (1975) or under the common law rule regarding the landowner’s obligation to trespassers. There is in this case no evidence of any wanton or willful conduct on the part of the defendant.

Accordingly, the petitions for reargument are denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Tantimonico v. Allendale Mutual Insurance, 642 A.2d 1169, 1994 R.I. LEXIS 146, 1994 WL 171753 (R.I. 1994).

642 A.2d 1169 (Tantimonico v. Allendale Mutual Insurance) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

King v. Narragansett Electric Company, Wc92-161 (1995)
Superior Court of Rhode Island, 1995