Tansah Jenae Adams v. Bank of America, N.A.
This text of Tansah Jenae Adams v. Bank of America, N.A. (Tansah Jenae Adams v. Bank of America, N.A.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
DISMISS and Opinion Filed April 20, 2021
S In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-20-01069-CV
TANSAH JENAE ADAMS, Appellant V. BANK OF AMERICA, N.A., Appellee
On Appeal from the 162nd Judicial District Court Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DC-20-09833
MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Chief Justice Burns, Justice Molberg, and Justice Smith Opinion by Chief Justice Burns
We questioned our jurisdiction over this appeal from the trial court’s order
granting appellee’s motion for summary judgment and dismissing appellant’s breach
of contract claim as it did not appear to be final and appealable. See Lehmann v.
Har-Con Corp., 39 S.W.3d 191, 195 (Tex. 2001) (subject to mostly statutory
exceptions, appeal may be taken only from final judgment that disposes of all parties
and claims). The record reflected that appellant originally filed suit for breach of
contract, but after appellee moved for summary judgment, appellant added a claim
for fraudulent misrepresentation. Appellee did not amend or supplement its motion for summary judgment, and the trial court’s order specifically stated only the breach
of contract claim was being dismissed.
In letter briefing filed at our request, appellant notes the record reflects the
trial date set for August 24, 2021 has been canceled and the case has been closed.
She argues that “[c]losing an entire case can only be interpreted as the case and all
claims being disposed.” However, while the record may help clarify whether an
order is final when the order is vague, it does not when, as here, the order “clearly
and unequivocally” states it does not dispose of all claims. See Lehmann, 39 S.W.3d
at 205-06.
Because the appealed order is not final, we dismiss the appeal for want of
jurisdiction. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3(a); Lehmann, 39 S.W.3d at 195.
/Robert D. Burns, III/ ROBERT D. BURNS, III CHIEF JUSTICE
201069F.P05
–2– S Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas JUDGMENT
TANSAH JENAE ADAMS, On Appeal from the 162nd Judicial Appellant District Court, Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DC-20-09833. No. 05-20-01069-CV V. Opinion delivered by Chief Justice Burns, Justices Molberg and Smith BANK OF AMERICA, N.A., participating. Appellee
In accordance with this Court’s opinion of this date, we DISMISS the appeal.
We ORDER that appellee Bank of America, N.A. recover its costs, if any, of this appeal from appellant Tansah Jenae Adams.
Judgment entered April 20, 2021.
–3–
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Tansah Jenae Adams v. Bank of America, N.A., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/tansah-jenae-adams-v-bank-of-america-na-texapp-2021.