Tanner v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Tanner v. State

242 P. 1054, 33 Okla. Crim. 224

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

DecidedFebruary 6, 1926

DocketNo. A-5286.

StatusPublished

This text of 242 P. 1054 (Tanner v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Tanner v. State, 242 P. 1054, 33 Okla. Crim. 224 (Okla. Ct. App. 1926).

Pincite

Opinion

DOYLE, J.

Plaintiff in error, Dr. R. S. Tanner, was tried and convicted on an information charging that on or about the 8th day of July, 1921, he did unlawfully, fraudulently, and feloniously obtain property, to wit: Drugs and money of the total value of $7.30 from the City Drug Store, Strong City, by means and use of a certain false and bogus check. The jury failed to agree on the punishment. Motion for new trial was duly filed and overruled, and on March 11, 1924, he was, by the court, sentenced to imprisonment *225 in the state penitentiary for a term of one year. . To reverse the judgment, he appealed by filing in this court, September 9, 1924, petition in error with ease-made.

The defendant is not represented by counsel in this court, and no brief in support of the assignments of error has been filed.

We deem it sufficient to say that the information is sufficient and the demurrer thereto was properly overruled. An examination of the record discloses to us no prejudicial error, and the evidence of the defendant’s guilt was ample to justify the verdict.

The judgment of the district court of Roger Mills county is accordingly affirmed.

BESSEY, P. J., concurs. EDWARDS, J., disqualified.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

DOYLE, J.

Plaintiff in error, Dr. R. S. Tanner, was tried and convicted on an information charging that on or about the 8th day of July, 1921, he did unlawfully, fraudulently, and feloniously obtain property, to wit: Drugs and money of the total value of $7.30 from the City Drug Store, Strong City, by means and use of a certain false and bogus check. The jury failed to agree on the punishment. Motion for new trial was duly filed and overruled, and on March 11, 1924, he was, by the court, sentenced to imprisonment *225 in the state penitentiary for a term of one year. . To reverse the judgment, he appealed by filing in this court, September 9, 1924, petition in error with ease-made.

The defendant is not represented by counsel in this court, and no brief in support of the assignments of error has been filed.

We deem it sufficient to say that the information is sufficient and the demurrer thereto was properly overruled. An examination of the record discloses to us no prejudicial error, and the evidence of the defendant’s guilt was ample to justify the verdict.

The judgment of the district court of Roger Mills county is accordingly affirmed.

BESSEY, P. J., concurs. EDWARDS, J., disqualified.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

242 P. 1054, 33 Okla. Crim. 224, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/tanner-v-state-oklacrimapp-1926.