Tanner v. State

1911 OK CR 174, 114 P. 361, 5 Okla. Crim. 677, 1911 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 94
CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma
DecidedMarch 21, 1911
DocketNos. A-713, A-827.
StatusPublished

This text of 1911 OK CR 174 (Tanner v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Tanner v. State, 1911 OK CR 174, 114 P. 361, 5 Okla. Crim. 677, 1911 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 94 (Okla. Ct. App. 1911).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

W. ‘S. Tanner, plaintiff in error, was convicted in the county court of Coal county for a violation of -the prohibition law in two cases. Appeal was taken to this court in each case. The Attorney General has filed motions to dismiss said appeals,- for, the reasons as in the case of W. S. Tanner v. State (ante). The motions present the same questions. Por the reasons given in the opinion in that case, the motions to dismiss the appeals are granted and the causes are hereby remanded to the county court of Coal county, with direction to enforce the judgment and sentence in each case.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
1911 OK CR 174, 114 P. 361, 5 Okla. Crim. 677, 1911 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 94, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/tanner-v-state-oklacrimapp-1911.