Tanner v. State
This text of 910 S.E.2d 577 (Tanner v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
320 Ga. 557 FINAL COPY
S24A1076. TANNER v. THE STATE.
BOGGS, Chief Justice.
Appellant Dewayne David Tanner challenges the trial court’s
dismissal of his 2024 motion to withdraw his 2017 guilty pleas to
malice murder and other crimes in connection with the shooting
death of his wife, Stephanie Tanner, and the non-fatal shooting of
his mother-in-law, Beverly Broach. The trial court properly
dismissed Appellant’s motion as untimely, and we therefore affirm.
In April 2017, Appellant entered his guilty pleas in Floyd
County Superior Court and was sentenced to serve life in prison
without the possibility of parole plus 25 years. Seven years later, in
April 2024, Appellant filed a pro se motion to withdraw his guilty
pleas, contending among other things that his plea counsel rendered
ineffective assistance and that his guilty pleas were not knowingly
and voluntarily entered. The trial court dismissed the motion on the
ground that it was untimely and the court therefore lacked jurisdiction to consider it. Appellant filed a timely notice of appeal.
“It is well settled that when the term of court has expired in
which a defendant was sentenced pursuant to a guilty plea, the trial
court lacks jurisdiction to allow the withdrawal of the plea.” Kerch
v. State, 301 Ga. 814, 814 (804 SE2d 417) (2017) (cleaned up). On
Monday, April 24, 2017, during the March 2017 term of court,
Appellant entered his guilty pleas and the trial court sentenced him
on them. The term of court expired a week later when a new term
commenced on Monday, May 1, 2017. See OCGA § 15-6-3 (33)
(stating that the terms of the Floyd County Superior Court
“commence . . . [on the] [s]econd Monday in January, March, July,
and September and first Monday in May and November”).
In his pro se brief on appeal, Appellant contends that within 30
days of his sentencing, he sent a letter to the Floyd County Superior
Court clerk asking to take back his guilty pleas, and that she
responded to his letter. But the record on appeal contains no such
letter or response, and in any event, Appellant does not contend that
he filed his letter prior to the commencement of the new term of
2 court on May 1, 2017. Almost a year after Appellant was sentenced,
on April 5, 2018, he filed a motion to modify or reduce his sentence,
which was denied, but he did not file an actual motion to withdraw
his guilty pleas until April 29, 2024, more than seven years after
sentencing. The trial court therefore lacked jurisdiction to consider
Appellant’s motion to withdraw his guilty pleas and properly
dismissed it as untimely. See Bankston v. State, 307 Ga. 656, 657
(837 SE2d 788) (2020) (“A trial court lacks jurisdiction to permit the
withdrawal of a guilty plea once the term of court has expired in
which the defendant was sentenced.” (cleaned up)). Accordingly, we
affirm the trial court’s judgment.
Judgment affirmed. All the Justices concur.
3 Decided December 20, 2024.
Murder. Floyd Superior Court. Before Judge Sparks.
Dewayne D. Tanner, pro se.
Leigh E. Patterson, District Attorney, Elisabeth M. Giuliani,
Assistant District Attorney; Christopher M. Carr, Attorney General,
Beth A. Burton, Deputy Attorney General, Meghan H. Hill, Michael
A. Oldham, Clint C. Malcolm, Senior Assistant Attorneys General,
for appellee.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
910 S.E.2d 577, 320 Ga. 557, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/tanner-v-state-ga-2024.