Tanner v. State
This text of 139 S.E. 5 (Tanner v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinions
1. Remarks of counsel while addressing the jury, which do not undertake to introduce any material fact not disclosed by the evidence, do not constitute sufficient ground for declaring a mistrial. Western &c. R. Co. v. York, 128 Ga. 687 (58 S. E. 183).
2. The charge on the law of confessions was authorized by the evidence.
3. The evidence was sufficient to support the verdict.
Judgment affirmed.
Criminal Law, 16 C. J. p. 896, n. 85; p. 1002, n. 16; p. 1143, n. 98.
Homicide, 30 C. J. p. 310, n. 25.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
139 S.E. 5, 164 Ga. 490, 1927 Ga. LEXIS 217, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/tanner-v-state-ga-1927.