Tanner v. State

659 So. 2d 488, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 9033, 1995 WL 504976
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Tanner v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 744 So. 2d 1017
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided August 28, 1995·No. No. 94-1988·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Jack S. Tanner has filed an appeal of the order revoking his probation, arguing that this order should be overturned if the attempted sexual battery conviction which constituted the basis for the revocation of probation is overturned on appeal. Tanner’s conviction for attempted sexual battery has been affirmed by this court, Tanner v. State, No. 94-1147 (Fla. 1st DCA June 27, 1995), and therefore there is no basis presented for disturbing the revocation order.

However, the state concedes that the wrong scoresheet was utilized when appellant was resenteneed upon the revocation of probation. Accordingly, the sentence is VACATED and the cause is REMANDED for resentencing by reference to the scoresheet prepared in 1989 when appellant was placed on probation.

AFFIRMED in part, REVERSED in part, and REMANDED.

MICKLE, BENTON and VAN NORTWICK, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Tanner v. State, 659 So. 2d 488, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 9033, 1995 WL 504976 (Fla. Ct. App. 1995).

659 So. 2d 488 (Tanner v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.