Tanner v. Nordstrom Corporate Office
This text of Tanner v. Nordstrom Corporate Office (Tanner v. Nordstrom Corporate Office) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 08-7218
GREGORY BRYCE TANNER,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
NORDSTROM CORPORATE OFFICE,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Raymond A. Jackson, District Judge. (2:08-cv-00241-RAJ-FBS)
Submitted: February 19, 2009 Decided: February 24, 2009
Before WILKINSON, DUNCAN, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Gregory Bryce Tanner, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:
Gregory Bryce Tanner appeals the district court’s
order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint.
We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district
court. Tanner v. Nordstrom Corporate, No. 2:08-cv-00241-RAJ-FBS
(E.D. Va. filed June 16, 2008 & entered June 17, 2008). We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Tanner v. Nordstrom Corporate Office, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/tanner-v-nordstrom-corporate-office-ca4-2009.