Tanner v. Nordstrom Corporate Office

Fourth Circuit

Tanner v. Nordstrom Corporate Office

312 F. App'x 520

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided February 24, 2009·No. No. 08-7218·Published

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Gregory Bryce Tanner appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Tanner v. Nordstrom Corporate, No. 2:08-cv-00241-RAJ-FBS (E.D. Va. filed June 16, 2008 & entered June 17, 2008). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Gregory Bryce Tanner appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Tanner v. Nordstrom Corporate, No. 2:08-cv-00241-RAJ-FBS (E.D. Va. filed June 16, 2008 & entered June 17, 2008). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Tanner v. Nordstrom Corporate Office, 312 F. App'x 520 (4th Cir. 2009).

Pincite

312 F. App'x 520 (Tanner v. Nordstrom Corporate Office) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related