Tanner v. Cambon
This text of 26 La. Ann. 353 (Tanner v. Cambon) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Plaintiff alleges that he was engaged by the defendant to perform the duties of clerk, at an annual salary of $1500, to commence on the first day of October, 1870, and to end on the thirtieth [354]*354September following; that be faithfully performed his duty until the fifteenth October, when he was illegally and without cause discharged. He sued for the year’s salary, $1500, and he had judgment.
The evidence of the plaintiff himself does not satisfy us that Cambon contracted to employ him by the year; neither is there any evidence that he was employed by the year in the place which he says he left to go to Cambon’s, although he had been employed there several years, and it is not shown that the custom is among persons engaged in Cambon’s business to employ clerks by the year, while the testimony of Cambon is positive that he never made such an engagement with him. Plaintiff was discharged because he closed the store in which he was employed at an unreasonable hour. He was paid for the time he worked at the rate of $1500 per annum, and took the money without objection.
It is therefore ordered, adjudged and decreed that the judgment of the district court be avoided, annulled and reversed, and that there be judgment in favor of the defendant with costs in both courts.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
26 La. Ann. 353, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/tanner-v-cambon-la-1874.