Tanner v. Allen

16 Ky. 25
CourtCourt of Appeals of Kentucky
DecidedJuly 1, 1806
StatusPublished

This text of 16 Ky. 25 (Tanner v. Allen) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Kentucky primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Tanner v. Allen, 16 Ky. 25 (Ky. Ct. App. 1806).

Opinion

Opinion of the Court, by

Ch. J. Muter.

IT appears by the affidavit of Susanna Allen, the defendant in error, made before Jamison Hawkins, of Boone county, that the said Susanna Allen, at the time she was delivered of a female bastard child, as stated in the affidavit, was an inhabitant of Dearborne county, in the Indiana territory; and that she was delivered of said bastard child at the house of Isaac Allen, in the county and territory aforesaid. This affidavit being the foundation of all the subsequent proceedings, and it appearing clearly from it, that the crime was committed without the jurisdiction of this state, the court of Boone county erred in taking cognizance of it.

Judgment reversed with costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
16 Ky. 25, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/tanner-v-allen-kyctapp-1806.