Tanner Altizer v. State
This text of Tanner Altizer v. State (Tanner Altizer v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
|
|
NUMBER 13-10-00549-CR
COURT OF APPEALS
THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS
CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG
____________________________________________________________
TANNER ALTIZER, Appellant,
v.
THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee.
On appeal from the 252nd District Court
of Jefferson County, Texas.
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Before Justices Garza, Benavides, and Vela
Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam
Appellant, Tanner Altizer, by and through his attorney, has filed a motion to dismiss his appeal because he no longer desires to prosecute it. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.2(a). Without passing on the merits of the case, we grant the motion to dismiss pursuant to Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 42.2(a) and dismiss the appeal. Having dismissed the appeal at appellant's request, no motion for rehearing will be entertained, and our mandate will issue forthwith.
We GRANT counsel’s motion to withdraw. Other pending motions, if any, are dismissed as moot.
PER CURIAM
Do not publish.
See Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b).
Delivered and filed this
20th day of January, 2011.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Tanner Altizer v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/tanner-altizer-v-state-texapp-2011.