Tanner Altizer v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided January 20, 2011·No. 13-10-00549-CR·Published

Opinion

NUMBER 13-10-00549-CR

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG ____________________________________________________________

TANNER ALTIZER, Appellant,

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee. ____________________________________________________________

On appeal from the 252nd District Court of Jefferson County, Texas. ____________________________________________________________

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Justices Garza, Benavides, and Vela Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam

Appellant, Tanner Altizer, by and through his attorney, has filed a motion to dismiss

his appeal because he no longer desires to prosecute it. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.2(a).

Without passing on the merits of the case, we grant the motion to dismiss pursuant to

Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 42.2(a) and dismiss the appeal. Having dismissed

the appeal at appellant's request, no motion for rehearing will be entertained, and our mandate will issue forthwith.

We GRANT counsel’s motion to withdraw. Other pending motions, if any, are

dismissed as moot.

PER CURIAM

Do not publish. See TEX. R. APP. P. 47.2(b).

Delivered and filed this 20th day of January, 2011.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Tanner Altizer v. State, (Tex. Ct. App. 2011).

Tanner Altizer v. State (Tanner Altizer v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.