Tanner Advertising Group, L.L.C. v. Fayette County
429 F.3d 1012, 2005 U.S. App. LEXIS 23549, 2005 WL 2850068
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit·Decided November 1, 2005·No. 04-13210·Published·Cited by 9 cases
Opinion
A member of this Court in active service having requested a poll on the suggestion of rehearing en banc and a majority of the judges in this Court in active service having voted in favor of granting a rehearing en banc,
IT IS ORDERED that the above cause shall be reheard by this court en banc. The previous panel’s opinion is hereby VACATED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Tanner Advertising Group, L.L.C. v. Fayette County, 429 F.3d 1012, 2005 U.S. App. LEXIS 23549, 2005 WL 2850068 (11th Cir. 2005).
429 F.3d 1012 (Tanner Advertising Group, L.L.C. v. Fayette County) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
MAVERICK MEDIA GROUP v. Hillsborough County, Fla.
508 F. Supp. 2d 1126 (M.D. Florida, 2007)
Lockridge v. City of Oldsmar, Fla.
475 F. Supp. 2d 1240 (M.D. Florida, 2007)
Granite State Outdoor Advertising, Inc. v. City of Fort Lauderdale
194 F. App'x 754 (Eleventh Circuit, 2006)
Tanner Advertising Group, L.L.C. v. Fayette County
451 F.3d 777 (Eleventh Circuit, 2006)
Service Employees International Union, Local 3 Rachel Canning Velvet Hazard v. Municipality of Mt. Lebanon
446 F.3d 419 (Third Circuit, 2006)
Ser Empl Intl Union v. Mun Mt Lebanon
Third Circuit, 2006
KH Outdoor, LLC v. CLAY COUNTY, FLA.
410 F. Supp. 2d 1160 (M.D. Florida, 2006)