Tannenbaum v. Natchtigall
This text of 29 Misc. 759 (Tannenbaum v. Natchtigall) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The record fails to show that the defendant is a resident within the jurisdiction of the Municipal Court, and it has been repeatedly held that all the facts necessary to give an inferior court jurisdiction must appear in the record (Frees v. [760]*760Ford, 6 N. Y. 176; Gilbert v. York, 111 id. 544) and that to all such courts the rule necessarily applies, that their jurisdiction must appear and no presumption can be invoked in their favor. Tyroler v. Gummersbach, 28 Misc. Rep. 151.
Present: Freedman, P. J.; MacLean and Leventritt, JJ.
Judgment reversed and new trial ordered, with costs to appellant to abide event.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
29 Misc. 759, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/tannenbaum-v-natchtigall-nyappterm-1899.