Tannenbaum v. Natchtigall

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Tannenbaum v. Natchtigall

29 Misc. 759

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York·Decided October 15, 1899·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Per Ouriam.

The record fails to show that the defendant is a resident within the jurisdiction of the Municipal Court, and it has been repeatedly held that all the facts necessary to give an inferior court jurisdiction must appear in the record (Frees v. [760] Ford, 6 N. Y. 176; Gilbert v. York, 111 id. 544) and that to all such courts the rule necessarily applies, that their jurisdiction must appear and no presumption can be invoked in their favor. Tyroler v. Gummersbach, 28 Misc. Rep. 151.

Present: Freedman, P. J.; MacLean and Leventritt, JJ.

Judgment reversed and new trial ordered, with costs to appellant to abide event.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Ouriam.

The record fails to show that the defendant is a resident within the jurisdiction of the Municipal Court, and it has been repeatedly held that all the facts necessary to give an inferior court jurisdiction must appear in the record (Frees v. [760] Ford, 6 N. Y. 176; Gilbert v. York, 111 id. 544) and that to all such courts the rule necessarily applies, that their jurisdiction must appear and no presumption can be invoked in their favor. Tyroler v. Gummersbach, 28 Misc. Rep. 151.

Present: Freedman, P. J.; MacLean and Leventritt, JJ.

Judgment reversed and new trial ordered, with costs to appellant to abide event.

Tannenbaum v. Natchtigall, 29 Misc. 759 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1899).

Pincite

29 Misc. 759 (Tannenbaum v. Natchtigall) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related