Tannenbaum v. Hoar

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Tannenbaum v. Hoar

26 A.D.2d 980, 274 N.Y.S.2d 710, 1966 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3071

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided November 21, 1966·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Reynolds, J.

Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Ulster County, which denied appellant’s motion to dismiss the complaint after the jury could not reach a verdict and granted a new trial. Direction of a new trial is mandatory where as here the first trial resulted in a hung jury (CPLR 4113, subd. [b] ). The instant order is not an appealable order under CPLR 5701 (subd. [a]). (Aesman v. Fox, 26 A D 2d 739; Covell v. H. R. H. Constr. Corp., 24 A D 2d 566, affd. 17 N Y 2d 709). Appeal dismissed, without costs. Gibson, P. J., Herlihy, Aulisi and Staley, Jr., JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Reynolds, J.

Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Ulster County, which denied appellant’s motion to dismiss the complaint after the jury could not reach a verdict and granted a new trial. Direction of a new trial is mandatory where as here the first trial resulted in a hung jury (CPLR 4113, subd. [b] ). The instant order is not an appealable order under CPLR 5701 (subd. [a]). (Aesman v. Fox, 26 A D 2d 739; Covell v. H. R. H. Constr. Corp., 24 A D 2d 566, affd. 17 N Y 2d 709). Appeal dismissed, without costs. Gibson, P. J., Herlihy, Aulisi and Staley, Jr., JJ., concur.

Tannenbaum v. Hoar, 26 A.D.2d 980, 274 N.Y.S.2d 710, 1966 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3071 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1966).

Pincite

26 A.D.2d 980 (Tannenbaum v. Hoar) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related