Home/Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York/Tannenbaum v. Hoar

Tannenbaum v. Hoar

26 A.D.2d 980, 274 N.Y.S.2d 710, 1966 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3071
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedNovember 21, 1966
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 26 A.D.2d 980 (Tannenbaum v. Hoar) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Tannenbaum v. Hoar, 26 A.D.2d 980, 274 N.Y.S.2d 710, 1966 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3071 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1966).

Opinion

Reynolds, J.

Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Ulster County, which denied appellant’s motion to dismiss the complaint after the jury could not reach a verdict and granted a new trial. Direction of a new trial is mandatory where as here the first trial resulted in a hung jury (CPLR 4113, subd. [b] ). The instant order is not an appealable order under CPLR 5701 (subd. [a]). (Aesman v. Fox, 26 A D 2d 739; Covell v. H. R. H. Constr. Corp., 24 A D 2d 566, affd. 17 N Y 2d 709). Appeal dismissed, without costs. Gibson, P. J., Herlihy, Aulisi and Staley, Jr., JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Totaro v. Scarlatos
63 A.D.3d 1144 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2009)
State v. Exxon Corp.
7 A.D.3d 926 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2004)
Hanss v. Bodine
48 A.D.2d 764 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1975)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
26 A.D.2d 980, 274 N.Y.S.2d 710, 1966 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3071, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/tannenbaum-v-hoar-nyappdiv-1966.